Krieg
Full Member
Posts: 125
|
Post by Krieg on Jan 28, 2011 20:17:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Zach of Manime on Jan 29, 2011 4:21:39 GMT
You're late to the party on this, over a year old now. And his best one is the Revenge of the Sith review from a few weeks ago.
|
|
Krieg
Full Member
Posts: 125
|
Post by Krieg on Jan 29, 2011 10:55:27 GMT
I know. I haven't seen it mentioned here, though. Not everyone knows about it - I have seen it mentioned only one one forum out of many that I frequent.
|
|
|
Post by Vendaval Este on Jan 30, 2011 17:20:17 GMT
I've seen it mentioned everywhere but I've never bothered to watch it, why? It's an hour or over review of a Star Wars, I really don't care much about Star Wars as it is, I also especially avoidedi t when someone gave me the link saying "you should like this as you're connoisseur of bad movies", no sir, I don't see myself as one.
|
|
|
Post by Zach of Manime on Jan 31, 2011 6:12:52 GMT
It actually goes much deeper than "just an hour long review of Star Wars", there's a segment in his Episode III review called "The Language of Cinema" that could easily be used in a film theory class on the importance of non-verbal or dialogue based story-telling in film, about how the best films tell their stories through the language of visuals and cinema like cinematography, lighting, editing, pacing of a scene, etc. They're fairly scholarly in many ways, and use these subjects and examples to explain how the original Star Wars trilogy are great films, and how the prequel trilogy is not.
I would actually say the opposite of what the person said that linked you to it because "you're a connoisseur of bad movies." As the connoisseur of great films I know you can be, it is worth it.
|
|